450
overlooked in making some at any rate, of the
appointments to which attention is drawn. They
finally represent that their prospects of pro-
motion have been materially damaged; and ask
that their case may be granted favourable con-
sideration, and that their claims may in future
placed
be get on a more definite basis.
3.
Before explaining the grounds on
which each of the eight appointments referred
to was made, I propose to deal with the general
question of the rights of cadets serving in
Hong Kong to be considered as having a "pre-
ferential claim" to certain appointments in
the public service of the Colony.
4.
The memorialists refer to Sir G.P.
Boyen's despatch No.84 of the 3rd May 1883, and
Lord Derby's despatch No.155 of the 3rd August
in reply thereto, as, together with Mr
Chamberlain's despatch No.171 of the 13th June
last, "defining the rights and privileges of
cadets in the Civil Service of the Colony".
As
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.